KKS V1J: Difference between revisions
From My wiki
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
* たてる] たたる（元・清ィ・俊ィ）- The 新撰和歌 also reads たたる, as do some of the early poetic manuals. They seem to mean roughly the same thing (Katagiri suggests a sound change たちたる -> たったる -> たたる (whereas たてる is たちある -> たてる). Fujiwara no Norinaga claimed that a manuscript in the hand of Ki no Tsurayuki's sister read たたる and that Emperor Sutoku agreed with that reading. Shunzei also supported the reading. Mabuchi noted that たたる is an old word and seems to have thought it fit better with this anonymous poem, but no modern edition emends the text. Takeoka notes that たたる occurs in a ''sekimori poem'' in [[MYS 4375]] and may have been dialect, and Katagiri agrees that it is either dialect or old-fashioned. | * たてる] たたる（元・清ィ・俊ィ）- The 新撰和歌 also reads たたる, as do some of the early poetic manuals. They seem to mean roughly the same thing (Katagiri suggests a sound change たちたる -> たったる -> たたる (whereas たてる is たちある -> たてる). Fujiwara no Norinaga claimed that a manuscript in the hand of Ki no Tsurayuki's sister read たたる and that Emperor Sutoku agreed with that reading. Shunzei also supported the reading. Mabuchi noted that たたる is an old word and seems to have thought it fit better with this anonymous poem, but no modern edition emends the text. Takeoka notes that たたる occurs in a ''sekimori poem'' in [[MYS 4375]] and may have been dialect, and Katagiri agrees that it is either dialect or old-fashioned. | ||
* いづこ] いづく（清ィ） | * いづこ] いづく（清ィ） | ||
-- | |||
清濁・漢字の読み | 清濁・漢字の読み | ||
| Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
梅がえにきゐる鶯春かけてなけどもいまだ雪は降つゝ | 梅がえにきゐる鶯春かけてなけどもいまだ雪は降つゝ | ||
-- | |||
漢字の読み | 漢字の読み | ||
| Line 51: | Line 55: | ||
;梅 | ;梅 | ||
:This word was read うめ in the MYS but in the Heian period it was often むめ. The manuscripts of KKS in Kyusojin Hitaku's 成立論・資料編 overwhelmingly read むめ in kana, with only a single うめ and a few kanji. | :This word was read うめ in the MYS but in the Heian period it was often むめ. The manuscripts of KKS in Kyusojin Hitaku's 成立論・資料編 overwhelmingly read むめ in kana, with only a single うめ and a few kanji. | ||
= [[KKS 6|6]] = | |||
雪の木にふりかゝれるをよめる | |||
素性法師 | |||
春たてば花とや見らん白雪のかゝれる枝にうぐひすのなく | |||
* 見らん] 見えん（清）- Some Kiyosuke-bon manuscripts mark this reading as doubtful. Teika rejected the alternate reading which ended the discussion. Takeoka quotes the Edo-period scholar Fujitani Nariakira who thought that the text had been changed to みえん by someone unfamiliar with the grammar (みらん is a shortening of the more familiar みるらん). But え and ら can look quite similar in calligraphic writing so it could be a miscopying as well. | |||
* のなく] ぞなく（伊）- This reading is also found in the editions that use the 伊達家本 as the base text (竹岡全評釈・新編国歌大観・和歌文学大系). | |||
Revision as of 14:15, 2 June 2026
ふるとしに春たちける日よめる
在原元方
年の内に春はきにけり一とせをこぞとやいはんことしとやいはん
春たちける日よめる
紀貫之
袖ひちてむすびし水の氷れるを春たつけふの風やとくらん
題しらず
よみ人しらず
春霞たてるやいづこみよしのゝ吉野の山に雪はふりつゝ
- たてる] たたる（元・清ィ・俊ィ）- The 新撰和歌 also reads たたる, as do some of the early poetic manuals. They seem to mean roughly the same thing (Katagiri suggests a sound change たちたる -> たったる -> たたる (whereas たてる is たちある -> たてる). Fujiwara no Norinaga claimed that a manuscript in the hand of Ki no Tsurayuki's sister read たたる and that Emperor Sutoku agreed with that reading. Shunzei also supported the reading. Mabuchi noted that たたる is an old word and seems to have thought it fit better with this anonymous poem, but no modern edition emends the text. Takeoka notes that たたる occurs in a sekimori poem in MYS 4375 and may have been dialect, and Katagiri agrees that it is either dialect or old-fashioned.
- いづこ] いづく（清ィ）
--
清濁・漢字の読み
- 春霞
- Although this is commonly voiced as はるがすみ (or simply not assigned a reading at all), Takeoka does not voice on the evidence of the 声点本, some medieval commentaries, and the 時代別国語大辞典.
二条のきさきの春のはしめの御歌
雪のうちに春はきにけり鶯のこほれる涙いまやとくらん
- 二条のきさきの] These words are not in the preface in 元, instead 二条后 is in the "author" place.
題しらず
よみ人しらず
梅がえにきゐる鶯春かけてなけどもいまだ雪は降つゝ
--
漢字の読み
- 梅
- This word was read うめ in the MYS but in the Heian period it was often むめ. The manuscripts of KKS in Kyusojin Hitaku's 成立論・資料編 overwhelmingly read むめ in kana, with only a single うめ and a few kanji.
雪の木にふりかゝれるをよめる
素性法師
春たてば花とや見らん白雪のかゝれる枝にうぐひすのなく
- 見らん] 見えん（清）- Some Kiyosuke-bon manuscripts mark this reading as doubtful. Teika rejected the alternate reading which ended the discussion. Takeoka quotes the Edo-period scholar Fujitani Nariakira who thought that the text had been changed to みえん by someone unfamiliar with the grammar (みらん is a shortening of the more familiar みるらん). But え and ら can look quite similar in calligraphic writing so it could be a miscopying as well.
- のなく] ぞなく（伊）- This reading is also found in the editions that use the 伊達家本 as the base text (竹岡全評釈・新編国歌大観・和歌文学大系).
